{"id":"W2568126344","doi":"10.1177/0093854816683956","title":"Assessing the Calibration of Actuarial Risk Scales","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Safety Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Calibration; Index (typography); Statistic; Statistics; Credibility; Actuarial science; Risk assessment; Poison control; Econometrics; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Medicine; Computer security; Medical emergency; Clinical psychology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2087171,0.001310357,0.0009826898,0.005273121,0.0008963319,0.003746673,0.002106735,0.001769585,0.003433774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6014478,0.0007218132,0.002130276,0.003146741,0.003473385,0.00442089,0.004223015,0.002787481,0.0008353709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001474142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001327663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001113418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007191964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8713881,0.08027943,0.009107689,0.006613728,0.03127427,0.001336674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3666325,0.5124328,0.04055942,0.05099525,0.02825397,0.001126152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001326166,0.0003946863,0.467848,0.0006558464,0.002718071,0.0001636379,0.005160454,0.04914645,0.001601933,0.04800621,0.004603772,0.4183747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002175284,0.004070864,0.6664026,0.00213327,0.0009626008,0.001140497,0.00397859,0.1643872,0.01132071,0.1227772,0.02186463,0.0007442674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4002632,0.002657433,0.5368199,0.001563719,0.0005034282,0.002095301,0.001434995,0.001348135,0.0533139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9162853,0.0004845203,0.08043798,0.0003311046,0.0001116021,0.0008652632,0.0005985809,0.0001863885,0.0006991925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2087171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9757927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06575939682444064,"score_gpt":0.3801436817076144,"score_spread":0.3143842848831738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}