{"id":"W2569474846","doi":"10.4230/dagrep.6.4.80","title":"Natural Language Argumentation: Mining, Processing, and Reasoning over Textual Arguments (Dagstuhl Seminar 16161)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Natural (archaeology); Computer science; Cognition; Task (project management); Epistemology; Computational linguistics; Natural language; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Management; History","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01709984,0.001761133,0.001693311,0.002564316,0.002111643,0.00997436,0.002214944,0.00331272,0.03109209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0231386,0.001071289,0.001885243,0.002322211,0.002464189,0.005656247,0.007327095,0.005344171,0.02430602],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003730646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004761932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001168756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001163274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886758,0.005717055,0.0006996476,0.001687493,0.002343798,0.0008762426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921755,0.004062249,0.0003198867,0.0006357311,0.001143548,0.001663023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001068446,0.0009922883,0.0007843148,0.00117477,0.0001626506,0.0004157668,0.002679005,0.005260255,0.005709956,0.08021108,0.5106583,0.3908833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003841977,0.0002444059,0.003564545,0.001045489,0.00005521217,0.0003725043,0.0007744079,0.00900627,0.006707051,0.1858545,0.7918742,0.000117183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.07801486,0.1004189,0.3777217,0.2215557,0.04049982,0.002512448,0.01385815,0.01147301,0.1539456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3481506,0.03991983,0.3045667,0.00874886,0.01864353,0.002905193,0.03259456,0.006249938,0.2382209],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03109209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1040134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008148196413969548,"score_gpt":0.2725896490723868,"score_spread":0.2644414526584173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}