{"id":"W2570670791","doi":"10.1016/j.accinf.2016.12.001","title":"External auditors' evaluation of the internal audit function: An empirical investigation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Accounting Information Systems","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Florida Atlantic University; Florida Gulf Coast University; University of Florida; Florida International University","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Audit; Internal audit; Accounting; Objectivity (philosophy); Psychology; Position (finance); External auditor; Function (biology); Empirical evidence; Social psychology; Business; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004603735,0.0001978868,0.0002627983,0.0004363297,0.0004224497,0.002281627,0.001933828,0.00009695152,0.0001197553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0108574,0.0001541606,0.0001882169,0.0001610899,0.0001368846,0.01579461,0.0004098068,0.0003545075,0.00009954712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002743712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001868021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000571057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000341202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948294,0.00007160833,0.001445464,0.0001419503,0.003325397,0.000186175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.944127,0.00005203748,0.05002519,0.000420984,0.005351981,0.00002282486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002270896,0.00008219015,0.8596004,0.0001811598,0.0003433245,0.000004109088,0.0008479333,0.0230042,0.0008466304,0.007266592,0.01343204,0.09416433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001811301,0.0000329858,0.8181952,0.0009627434,0.0002055585,0.00005685425,0.0008114688,0.04563349,0.0001553671,0.001274899,0.1306171,0.0002430675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9028774,0.00003807004,0.07022997,0.001196639,0.0177587,0.0003265948,0.000006878948,0.00003292549,0.00753278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914238,0.000004386429,0.0001062367,0.0006846891,0.00765836,0.00001065226,0.00001157225,0.00001604582,0.00008428819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1171851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987541,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02647115280453752,"score_gpt":0.2840380151297653,"score_spread":0.2575668623252277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}