{"id":"W2572544426","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0170164","title":"Upon Accounting for the Impact of Isoenzyme Loss, Gene Deletion Costs Anticorrelate with Their Evolutionary Rates","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Army Research Office; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; U.S. Department of Energy; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Genetic Fitness; Biology; Flux balance analysis; Epistasis; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Gene; Genetics; Function (biology); Organism; Metric (unit); Loss function; Computational biology; Phenotype; Evolutionary biology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000139749,0.00009794955,0.0001156642,0.00001691196,0.0001834989,0.00002410596,0.0001475896,0.0000651022,0.000003449118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001147053,0.00005893327,0.00006181382,0.00002483776,0.0000558938,0.000007668866,0.00003662136,0.00005178012,0.000001117677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001286326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000313044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008744598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007322072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995329,0.00001034043,0.0001030246,0.0001604121,0.00005945803,0.000133858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993173,0.00000646805,0.000134907,0.0003642638,0.0001583378,0.00001870683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001527287,0.0001317559,0.005562214,0.00002157912,0.0002649517,1.262976e-7,0.00001066664,0.0004309311,0.9927044,0.000009089965,0.0001438959,0.0005676554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003448882,0.0002322888,0.04381748,0.00005949,0.00007346807,0.000007802566,0.000007253238,0.002023225,0.9531859,0.00000821137,0.0001426583,0.00009728538],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964117,0.001263215,0.001808671,0.0001476688,0.00005463071,0.0002459589,0.00004235171,0.000008191386,0.00001759572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976926,0.0005435218,0.001117417,0.000007245999,0.0004373211,0.00001653358,0.00006849776,0.00001548159,0.0001013224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03951846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2403229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01671628884103933,"score_gpt":0.2362828827289629,"score_spread":0.2195665938879236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}