{"id":"W2573655603","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2016-0348","title":"Cost of climate change mitigation in Canada’s forest sector","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"FPInnovations","keywords":"Environmental science; Greenhouse gas; Climate change mitigation; Bioenergy; Opportunity cost; Biomass (ecology); Forest management; Climate change; Unit (ring theory); Revenue; Total cost; Business; Natural resource economics; Forestry; Agroforestry; Renewable energy; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007650866,0.0004151723,0.0002897197,0.001339688,0.001453293,0.002156893,0.0007969923,0.0003801658,0.001422566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002103861,0.0002550748,0.0006994565,0.002443727,0.0005050693,0.0008083754,0.0006123045,0.0004692144,0.00008300076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05786917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04035604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989605,0.0001219354,0.00003099218,0.00006881322,0.000396174,0.000421559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999016,0.0001302198,0.0001310127,0.00004079834,0.0005487648,0.0001331309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005891994,0.0001669495,0.4383512,0.0003818176,0.0007646984,0.0005256392,0.0004673774,0.4008359,0.00572855,0.02093752,0.007599265,0.123652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006684882,0.0001977461,0.7016631,0.0002087153,0.00069233,0.0003224911,0.003056409,0.2541706,0.004657739,0.00501742,0.02978691,0.0001597456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9657164,0.002239546,0.002360877,0.001035234,0.00002219078,0.0001091942,0.003791837,0.000060788,0.02466383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944331,0.0007743075,0.00194647,0.00006213324,0.000002821525,0.00001307346,0.0008757915,0.000008133367,0.00188416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05786917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4198722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09580119572298337,"score_gpt":0.3311070699958796,"score_spread":0.2353058742728963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}