{"id":"W2574151720","doi":"","title":"Shale Gas Royalties in New Brunswick: An Evaluation","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal of New Brunswick Studies / Revue d’études sur le Nouveau-Brunswick","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Shale gas; Documentation; Oil shale; Natural gas; Productivity; Government revenue; Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Petroleum engineering; Engineering; Accounting; Geography; Economic growth; Waste management; Archaeology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003476111,0.001468997,0.002344729,0.0002091448,0.000556306,0.0001858217,0.001781955,0.0007584353,0.001927076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092423,0.001254607,0.0008610427,0.001079065,0.001510986,0.003502842,0.0009856899,0.001308205,0.0005745979],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006096256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01165421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1044681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3043528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896247,0.0009655596,0.003436354,0.001507741,0.002386552,0.002079094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936092,0.0007172992,0.002611266,0.00128414,0.0002786337,0.001499483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001154829,0.003683142,0.5518807,0.0004716015,0.001559604,0.0008591398,0.02189242,0.1220563,0.002681382,0.007353262,0.02144317,0.2649645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01493396,0.00412193,0.8265564,0.003981454,0.001228922,0.001369126,0.01721259,0.006726247,0.0004387562,0.004836755,0.1156082,0.002985593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9276333,0.03791216,0.002589651,0.02485986,0.004214015,0.00116525,0.000005696817,0.00006803637,0.001551965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8494139,0.05269591,0.02604995,0.001240449,0.003766993,0.000007486908,0.00001016755,0.000351103,0.06646398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2746758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03914715057900647,"score_gpt":0.2712669856751464,"score_spread":0.2321198350961399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}