{"id":"W2574564457","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2016.1102","title":"Mutual and Exclusive: Dyadic Sources of Trust in Interorganizational Exchange","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dyad; Conceptualization; Position (finance); Information exchange; Power (physics); Social exchange theory; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009314043,0.000298117,0.0005399133,0.001297673,0.001763347,0.004311197,0.0008533294,0.0007685998,0.005575191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05936093,0.0004051256,0.0004534672,0.001400508,0.002433009,0.007232575,0.006581876,0.001752791,0.0001907166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002218958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00269253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005059151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006160006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9872838,0.00856988,0.0006587052,0.0009244735,0.002000856,0.0005621385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9170021,0.05437772,0.01433375,0.006541685,0.004827609,0.002917147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001407221,0.0005531685,0.5687237,0.0008181755,0.0007188727,0.001339076,0.1146894,0.003440342,0.002185742,0.1606943,0.002941677,0.1424883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001897976,0.0005211903,0.6936793,0.0006690004,0.0006640469,0.001251809,0.06849451,0.01511775,0.001453246,0.208272,0.009465476,0.0002218233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9392605,0.0008963763,0.02374045,0.002720222,0.00005560148,0.000142982,0.0002532298,0.00003275973,0.03289785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981515,0.0001055882,0.001314363,0.0000432934,0.000007610568,0.00003988196,0.00003845208,0.000004386173,0.0002950036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009314043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04925799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02123997649836404,"score_gpt":0.2662332445613368,"score_spread":0.2449932680629728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}