{"id":"W2574894236","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2016-0327","title":"Riparian forest structure and stream geomorphic condition: implications for flood resilience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Northeastern States Research Cooperative; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Riparian zone; Flood myth; Hydrology (agriculture); Riparian forest; Land cover; Basal area; STREAMS; Vegetation (pathology); Environmental science; Erosion; Shrub; Physical geography; Geography; Ecology; Land use; Geology; Geomorphology; Forestry; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004196661,0.0001044501,0.0001124961,0.0006669543,0.0002482673,0.000578127,0.0001469467,0.0001767665,0.00176367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014781,0.00008236526,0.0001277408,0.0005356087,0.000542916,0.0005918776,0.0003313153,0.000163287,0.0000953437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006653731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006030512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01675934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04954388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998932,0.00004054886,0.000006220801,0.00001966354,0.00001285935,0.0000274943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999141,0.0002686043,0.0002846056,0.0000295288,0.0000711438,0.0002051753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005220313,0.00003444748,0.9825781,0.00001747572,0.00004795146,0.00009435797,0.0001432149,0.002057029,0.0008463612,0.0004820054,0.0001737692,0.01347299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001040538,0.00001346688,0.9983682,0.000004757109,0.000006108331,0.0000260417,0.0001081664,0.001058607,0.00003402725,0.0002920831,0.00008486852,0.000002653051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983596,0.0002356933,0.0002669853,0.0001718049,0.000001068585,0.000004370388,0.000108799,0.000004716282,0.0008469997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999535,0.0001102155,0.0001535777,0.0000158438,0.000003543422,0.00000241944,0.00005217588,0.000001169175,0.0001261238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01675934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03332359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03455655940368567,"score_gpt":0.3190464194999875,"score_spread":0.2844898600963018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}