{"id":"W2575930004","doi":"10.5849/jof.16-038","title":"A Case for Indigenous Community Forestry","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Community forestry; Forest management; Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Community development; Natural resource management; Natural resource; Business; Sustainable development; Environmental planning; Forestry; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005257191,0.00007900163,0.0001209764,0.00003208695,0.001594583,0.0001010506,0.0007969032,0.00005844898,0.0001049517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000169609,0.00006437845,0.0001206742,0.00002530444,0.0001897352,0.0002259011,0.0004513882,0.0002280355,0.00001541132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009064212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001862989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008981907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004972152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993577,0.00003463915,0.000199533,0.0000614242,0.0001859622,0.0001607589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988864,0.00005539769,0.0004464994,0.0004880958,0.00002479048,0.0000988098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005213785,0.0001143332,0.9896753,0.00002393816,0.00003408699,0.0005570174,0.001293877,0.0001729487,0.00004283668,0.000004311645,0.0026321,0.005397043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000744533,0.0002203949,0.9806879,0.00001830673,0.00005784331,0.00119465,0.001309942,0.0001006371,0.00008189567,0.001713798,0.01377272,0.00009736602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965584,0.000017405,0.0002930663,0.0004460755,0.00018133,0.0001381767,0.00001012023,0.000005024623,0.002350347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979072,0.00001025789,0.001322271,0.0001298967,0.00009455074,0.000001524938,0.000001239822,0.000005001233,0.0005280381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01114062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03937807652087405,"score_gpt":0.2596717489323087,"score_spread":0.2202936724114347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}