{"id":"W25763866","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0115657","title":"Regret-based utility elicitation in constraint-based decision problems","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Preference elicitation; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Preference; Heuristic; Constraint (computer-aided design); Minimax; Binary decision diagram; Optimization problem; Product (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01712432,0.001383428,0.001701139,0.001358456,0.0005632221,0.001943141,0.001596002,0.001652415,0.01199842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06537531,0.0004751235,0.0008974022,0.001730492,0.0009777038,0.001379267,0.001871984,0.003232054,0.0009483041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002289126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003805584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003224276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006984306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9710868,0.02517833,0.0005386157,0.0007490534,0.002024106,0.0004230483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9340677,0.05977726,0.001790434,0.001529049,0.002051914,0.0007836926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004495551,0.001169145,0.00261804,0.002058274,0.0005890458,0.0003279661,0.0006468215,0.462113,0.001534367,0.08143871,0.04766097,0.3953483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001041906,0.0005854418,0.0009738561,0.0002940492,0.0001024151,0.00009555953,0.0001619065,0.8637533,0.001063857,0.1249009,0.006971897,0.00005486329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03715936,0.002360598,0.9099602,0.006935734,0.0002443855,0.00352884,0.002265281,0.0006631856,0.03688249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6162268,0.001398932,0.371178,0.001230795,0.0001655484,0.003163553,0.002048569,0.0001497977,0.004438032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01712432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09056318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1005012886310663,"score_gpt":0.3222350740173838,"score_spread":0.2217337853863176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}