{"id":"W25768861","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2006-0006","title":"STABILITY ANALYSIS OF THE THIN POWER LAW LIQUID FILM FLOWING DOWN ON A VERTICAL CYLINDER","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Cylinder; Planar; Curvature; Mechanics; Kinematic wave; Flow (mathematics); Instability; RADIUS; Materials science; Power law; Radius of curvature; Physics; Optics; Classical mechanics; Geometry; Mathematics; Mean curvature flow; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002332568,0.0001559666,0.0002646446,0.00004953126,0.0001661144,0.00001516219,0.0003159205,0.0001815061,0.00005948085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002064056,0.0001187615,0.001270721,0.0006201887,0.00005360018,0.00004990445,0.000007588086,0.0003243553,4.05483e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003175941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006597079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008704239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0483114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989986,0.00001051626,0.0003236384,0.0001525419,0.0002101018,0.000304645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992628,0.0001199639,0.00001304273,0.000449086,0.00004890205,0.0001061825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005958841,0.00002034152,0.000002388034,0.0000440131,0.0005426659,7.989077e-8,0.000127777,0.9506509,0.01604556,0.03251061,0.00004048793,0.000009159307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001784977,0.00002931452,0.000190396,0.00002784089,0.0004470263,4.546735e-7,0.00003642639,0.9585112,0.03998375,0.000166972,0.0002936159,0.0001344594],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6851445,0.0001040552,0.3099611,0.0007546574,0.001460366,0.0007134177,0.0009185491,0.000165945,0.0007773034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986454,0.000001474491,0.001183803,0.00008073547,0.00001544356,0.00002079793,0.000006111854,0.00003069116,0.00001550036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3135009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006039435412420446,"score_gpt":0.1778781005757509,"score_spread":0.1718386651633305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}