{"id":"W2577624916","doi":"10.1617/s11527-017-0993-y","title":"Mix design approach for low-powder self-consolidating concrete: Eco-SCC—content optimization and performance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Materials and Structures","topic":"Concrete and Cement Materials Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Silica fume; Gradation; Materials science; Durability; Portland cement; Fly ash; Shrinkage; Self-consolidating concrete; Aggregate (composite); Rheology; Superplasticizer; Volume (thermodynamics); Compressive strength; Composite material; Cement; Solid mechanics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004500791,0.0006034804,0.0006632134,0.0009158581,0.0003911462,0.0008576997,0.0008484344,0.0006226597,0.004157941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003731254,0.0004106146,0.0005941375,0.0005310018,0.0002364055,0.0003844975,0.0005997507,0.0003658705,0.0007660076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006255529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009983948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002403029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006406534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996686,0.00004542792,0.00001287294,0.00004625173,0.0001967703,0.00003005527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998468,0.00002950055,0.00003055321,0.00001180266,0.00007214623,0.000009195128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004600478,0.0003142263,0.002348297,0.0003872174,0.0001003198,0.00008347825,0.00009119703,0.7128817,0.1925735,0.005222277,0.0007842415,0.08475348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004246425,0.000570711,0.001417796,0.00001399324,0.00008662607,0.0000333252,0.00005300712,0.9383752,0.05418577,0.0007492264,0.004452818,0.00001909663],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2876323,0.0003702579,0.6794494,0.0001083732,0.00004346576,0.0003690138,0.0002885186,0.0009332155,0.0308055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9087232,0.0001141056,0.08232338,0.00003126895,0.00000906593,0.000236868,0.0001222669,0.0001055749,0.008334232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004157941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01390964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03223116923652428,"score_gpt":0.2424162088339454,"score_spread":0.2101850395974211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}