{"id":"W2578210650","doi":"10.1101/099127","title":"Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation – a benchmark of computational metagenomics software","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Office of Science; Joint Genome Institute; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; U.S. Department of Energy; Division of Mathematical Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Metagenomics; Benchmarking; Profiling (computer programming); Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Software; Genome; Data science; Computational biology; Data mining; Biology; Geography; Genetics; Gene; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03537288,0.002154755,0.001046886,0.003252838,0.001456602,0.004154894,0.003385044,0.001354467,0.001770252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06891948,0.0006221336,0.00146974,0.00403709,0.0018243,0.003385691,0.004293515,0.002994373,0.001063583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002360892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003336411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003285179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00259545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9815521,0.008203265,0.001521514,0.00239273,0.005634053,0.0006964046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9478284,0.02361977,0.002098738,0.01134998,0.01358255,0.001520627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006083709,0.002386763,0.1305209,0.003878812,0.001830678,0.0006591097,0.003333682,0.1880398,0.09892169,0.02537817,0.08593485,0.453032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006076848,0.002021629,0.03856061,0.0006332145,0.0002590947,0.0003722377,0.001296361,0.7319919,0.1638748,0.02500591,0.03507862,0.0002979779],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.7919697,0.00367477,0.1346055,0.003415164,0.0009398626,0.000782722,0.01100964,0.039392,0.01421058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7580562,0.0005711811,0.2012789,0.0007383291,0.0001395928,0.0006092485,0.03084856,0.006884087,0.0008739699],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9646271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1870719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01429977339638401,"score_gpt":0.270568447096628,"score_spread":0.256268673700244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}