{"id":"W2578264583","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.031","title":"Economic evaluation of building energy retrofits: A fuzzy based approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy and Buildings","topic":"Life Cycle Costing Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"FortisBC","keywords":"Retrofitting; Fuzzy logic; Life-cycle cost analysis; Fuzzy set; Asset (computer security); Engineering; Efficient energy use; Computer science; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Reliability engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002644401,0.001048445,0.001151934,0.004688707,0.0008044032,0.002674213,0.00115758,0.00105006,0.003134927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004891838,0.0004610382,0.00142489,0.002483265,0.0008440503,0.001566075,0.0006468062,0.0006667983,0.0001493138],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003512541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00125029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009263255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009289005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981788,0.0008229754,0.00007055206,0.00007744239,0.0007211355,0.0001291208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981443,0.001253253,0.0001348767,0.00004855166,0.0003498104,0.00006912657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002512566,0.0002158031,0.003265301,0.0002129733,0.0002514911,0.0002021146,0.00007210468,0.9035454,0.002587917,0.03359791,0.0005746157,0.05522308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001441973,0.0001417797,0.00228903,0.00004018041,0.00009149908,0.00005137369,0.0001219902,0.9835659,0.000928897,0.01208901,0.0006414896,0.00002441774],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3924617,0.002151849,0.556495,0.0006251899,0.0001327468,0.0004194321,0.0006251159,0.0001179706,0.04697111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716447,0.0003978372,0.02608629,0.00001967865,0.00002858049,0.00008521003,0.00009863896,0.00001100208,0.001628103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009263255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02548546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02756361439887615,"score_gpt":0.2520339927301782,"score_spread":0.224470378331302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}