{"id":"W2578968830","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2016-0306","title":"Fish community assessment with eDNA metabarcoding: effects of sampling design and bioinformatic filtering","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":229,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Species richness; Biology; Biodiversity; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006933634,0.00008874165,0.0001803779,0.00004603742,0.001673637,0.000208758,0.0003465381,0.0000178169,0.00003624245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001570488,0.00006431192,0.00001936137,0.0000486198,0.002407421,0.0006944227,0.0001148595,0.0001091332,5.531217e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005235997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002723029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006249997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00272733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993407,0.00005493027,0.0001644831,0.00007159824,0.0001973922,0.0001709257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991802,0.0002190803,0.0002891975,0.0001203973,0.000003927282,0.0001872207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004142228,0.0000082475,0.9885845,0.00004739943,0.00002721754,0.00001008795,0.003283446,0.00007238094,0.0005795693,0.00001049797,0.000158539,0.007213966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000263852,0.0005683787,0.9934552,0.0001666715,0.00004292329,0.00003777612,0.003333203,0.0005757976,0.000960495,0.0002310201,0.0002530435,0.000111619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967582,0.00007230352,0.001826078,0.0004285477,0.00006562642,0.00009219337,0.00000198897,0.000001163356,0.000753852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351437,0.00007612546,0.06468149,0.00007720249,0.000004728948,7.721924e-7,1.117114e-7,0.000001975721,0.00001389851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06285542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04650240444139653,"score_gpt":0.2413207608501438,"score_spread":0.1948183564087473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}