{"id":"W2578968830","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2016-0306","title":"Fish community assessment with eDNA metabarcoding: effects of sampling design and bioinformatic filtering","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":229,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Species richness; Biology; Biodiversity; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04421491,0.0009023348,0.00095783,0.001441082,0.001149576,0.001586705,0.001254596,0.001220809,0.0004956323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08549865,0.0006872611,0.001055784,0.001432871,0.001095191,0.001677136,0.001896297,0.0008230018,0.0001851878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008441323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009617704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006964491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01597906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.96573,0.02029463,0.003255258,0.004692946,0.005359586,0.0006675652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9195083,0.06069937,0.007536375,0.00574939,0.005732877,0.000773579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003050091,0.0006069982,0.7586817,0.0006715091,0.001955366,0.0003651722,0.002024402,0.017954,0.1051883,0.0008603365,0.0004562515,0.108186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001305652,0.003149112,0.775575,0.0001345944,0.001085172,0.0007478282,0.00057913,0.1480253,0.06597196,0.001582812,0.002837586,0.0001809743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7384391,0.000580485,0.2581415,0.0002472549,0.00005626476,0.0006641446,0.0002592869,0.0003370218,0.001274977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7748658,0.0001376553,0.2228281,0.0003555914,0.00001533122,0.0006581567,0.000366635,0.0001456113,0.000627115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04421491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2338336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04650240444139653,"score_gpt":0.2413207608501438,"score_spread":0.1948183564087473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}