{"id":"W2579293162","doi":"10.1037/cep0000101","title":"Chatting in the face of the eyewitness: The impact of extraneous cell-phone conversation on memory for a perpetrator.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Conversation; Distraction; Phone; Recall; Psychology; Eyewitness memory; QUIET; Face (sociological concept); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047241,0.0004119262,0.000233225,0.0002800651,0.0004238226,0.0006397406,0.0004265946,0.0005761505,0.003193299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006620001,0.0002145015,0.0002030324,0.00007322655,0.0005115523,0.0006090744,0.0009145983,0.0005730903,0.0004634714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001940044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000218115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00140025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002474014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994211,0.0002596531,0.0000327365,0.00007334659,0.0001419587,0.00007106461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996608,0.001498056,0.0009100698,0.000308583,0.0002308726,0.0004444302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008742466,0.001735443,0.1994849,0.00101343,0.0003606781,0.0117248,0.03080051,0.0002382391,0.584893,0.0002754453,0.001832592,0.1588985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001131206,0.007945267,0.8519353,0.0003359483,0.0004532473,0.01930281,0.02924112,0.0009969957,0.08420242,0.00051792,0.004869629,0.00008617325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985693,0.000317219,0.0001700789,0.00005668525,0.00001267131,0.000009611258,0.00002337943,0.00001133647,0.0008297877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998694,0.0002224348,0.0003634295,0.00007168954,0.0000104955,0.00001277391,0.00004345662,0.000007202351,0.0005744937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003193299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01068264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08208553685421292,"score_gpt":0.3635477291697676,"score_spread":0.2814621923155546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}