{"id":"W2579649797","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2016-0420","title":"Comparing compound-specific and bulk stable nitrogen isotope trophic discrimination factors across multiple freshwater fish species and diets","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, University of Wisconsin","keywords":"Trophic level; Food web; Stable isotope ratio; Isotope analysis; Biology; δ15N; Freshwater fish; Ecology; Isotopes of nitrogen; Habitat; Taxon; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Range (aeronautics); Zoology; Nitrogen; Chemistry; δ13C; Fishery","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004741382,0.0001200554,0.0002519696,0.00005926221,0.002154633,0.001004138,0.0003520005,0.00003855903,0.0002652451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017802,0.00009005229,0.0000298566,0.00006672739,0.002648243,0.0009415735,0.0001112935,0.0001000724,0.000001658889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008094373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003936407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01273989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3956956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989754,0.00003977226,0.0002523104,0.0002031089,0.0001922996,0.0003370875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992236,0.00009794168,0.0002491091,0.0001345359,0.00001348585,0.0002812812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003773433,0.000004861536,0.9952349,0.000003823064,0.000009663724,0.00001607827,0.002847548,0.00002109869,0.000232496,0.00002944022,0.0005521526,0.001044148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002531954,0.0001261485,0.9803208,0.00002120466,0.00001606218,0.00004604851,0.00376625,0.002350161,0.0002590794,0.001166406,0.01153641,0.0001382931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969234,0.000155084,0.00003300057,0.002002782,0.0001705918,0.0000680636,0.00001188776,0.000001861751,0.0006332561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989682,0.0001523277,0.0005800994,0.00008321577,0.00003411177,0.00000114315,0.000001364138,0.000004780803,0.0001747874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3829557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04343034807865797,"score_gpt":0.2390317085624324,"score_spread":0.1956013604837744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}