{"id":"W2579663487","doi":"10.1002/sim.7215","title":"Accounting for competing risks in randomized controlled trials: a review and recommendations for improvement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Cumulative incidence; Incidence (geometry); Outcome (game theory); Event (particle physics); Survival analysis; Medicine; Relative risk; Actuarial science; Confidence interval; Cohort; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2000932,0.0007115617,0.03982186,0.0004235818,0.0001681697,0.00006649049,0.000483893,0.000384783,0.000183716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9416268,0.0004348069,0.0009916383,0.0001590232,0.0004564319,0.00003822746,0.0001355614,0.0007843678,0.000001232019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001754492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002948626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006427499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005271671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9755104,0.008749117,0.01383447,0.0008662472,0.0004337368,0.0006060323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4135163,0.5783305,0.007198615,0.000532572,0.000321333,0.0001006024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002834314,0.00006227433,2.230432e-7,0.1212955,0.000597849,0.000002868482,0.00004053859,1.631567e-8,2.783328e-8,0.08028455,0.005893324,0.7889885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1798318,0.0001403165,6.98928e-8,0.1361159,0.01499806,0.000001725539,0.00003064282,0.0002643671,1.842363e-8,0.5131682,0.1551688,0.000280026],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[1.171178e-8,0.6325012,0.3363447,0.0008899962,0.0008931131,0.02712273,0.00208654,0.00001522812,0.0001463854],"genre_scores_gemma":[5.440304e-8,0.5287631,0.4613141,0.0001783038,0.0004230543,0.009068119,0.0001280612,0.0000561188,0.00006906847],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7887084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8315391831852751,"score_gpt":0.7107421776711227,"score_spread":0.1207970055141524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}