{"id":"W2580850282","doi":"","title":"Determination of Optimum Polymer Dose using UV-vis Spectrophotometry and its Comparison to Filtration Based Tests","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Residuals Science and Technology","topic":"Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Filtration (mathematics); Absorbance; Polymer; Chromatography; Spectrophotometry; Materials science; Capillary action; Wastewater; Chemistry; Environmental engineering; Composite material; Environmental science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001111805,0.00006818375,0.0001907076,0.0005931185,0.0001260195,0.00003546117,0.0001947349,0.00005528851,0.00001101741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003474067,0.00005484582,0.00001745112,0.001171444,0.000326246,0.0002505409,0.00008140415,0.00009305884,0.00000168038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005382234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002682733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003951191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003370233,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998948,0.00003591239,0.0002905851,0.0001569188,0.0004143995,0.0001541692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994186,0.00005261366,0.0002634074,0.0001056289,0.00007916446,0.000080649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000673516,0.00003004294,0.0494299,0.00000582182,0.000001923632,0.000001484568,0.0000731325,0.0002190375,0.9428913,0.00003936221,0.00001026229,0.007291029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001726931,0.0003758772,0.02497372,0.00003039487,0.00002206062,0.00002776108,0.0001244667,0.01113663,0.9627268,0.000307531,0.00003049716,0.00007154111],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968703,0.00008940965,0.002081554,0.0008401684,0.00003701879,0.00003856946,6.093351e-7,0.000006761486,0.00003554075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905967,0.000008474245,0.009336567,0.00002404761,0.00001987816,4.568679e-7,7.704782e-8,0.000002687614,0.000011147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02445617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2236548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02083322883391884,"score_gpt":0.3046784078207199,"score_spread":0.283845178986801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}