{"id":"W2581631667","doi":"10.1177/2043820615607767","title":"The in(ter)visible subjects of security and the (im)possibility of a ‘public’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogues in Human Geography","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Visibility; Critical security studies; Security studies; Sociology; Resilience (materials science); Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Cloud computing security; Philosophy; Geography; Network security policy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004564813,0.0006131776,0.0006593136,0.001010585,0.006198672,0.008558856,0.002184111,0.009574436,0.005678748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01807804,0.000361874,0.0004600435,0.0009705066,0.0341393,0.008802076,0.004081102,0.01571083,0.001289901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004141037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003510036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01134279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01829051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920579,0.004482374,0.0001930653,0.0007992051,0.001773071,0.0006943829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984737,0.01164764,0.0007937069,0.0004340025,0.001878701,0.0005090524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002564077,0.00000845288,0.0001121751,0.0001704858,0.000003888409,0.0002011089,0.02918258,0.0000945709,0.0001579595,0.8743579,0.09142838,0.00425697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008449328,0.00002430851,0.0005016274,0.0006502055,0.000009298125,0.0002592462,0.02782389,0.000317232,0.0004703757,0.2358324,0.7340698,0.00003319882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008607396,0.006971253,0.01643058,0.7790049,0.01606615,0.00003590997,0.00006478693,0.0000682761,0.1727507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6400703,0.007980949,0.007373242,0.2260027,0.01870054,0.0002616975,0.00008880512,0.0003785067,0.09914323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01134279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03004545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04796270417820869,"score_gpt":0.324903317651637,"score_spread":0.2769406134734283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}