{"id":"W2581631667","doi":"10.1177/2043820615607767","title":"The in(ter)visible subjects of security and the (im)possibility of a ‘public’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogues in Human Geography","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Visibility; Critical security studies; Security studies; Sociology; Resilience (materials science); Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Cloud computing security; Philosophy; Geography; Network security policy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01085719,0.00009564515,0.0002819301,0.0001742023,0.0003462576,0.00007975951,0.0005054411,0.0001037496,0.000007969144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001205523,0.00006164966,0.00009570786,0.001058171,0.003124188,0.0001976385,0.0001202759,0.000231453,6.102509e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003612284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002358796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07676477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1673212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968439,0.001645229,0.0004593415,0.0002018198,0.0004348984,0.0004147651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985116,0.0006594001,0.0001830474,0.000312264,0.0001881191,0.0001455486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004533469,0.0001298116,0.6724293,0.00002878376,0.000009290021,8.102617e-7,0.07844376,5.583952e-7,5.988289e-7,0.2480182,0.0001334048,0.0007601323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001662611,0.0001139783,0.3724088,0.00003615284,0.000006376315,3.426653e-7,0.01967326,0.00001437276,0.000009851793,0.59473,0.01122605,0.0001182866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717032,0.001938097,0.000001187913,0.001770762,0.000175273,0.0004432657,0.00002223151,0.00001532189,0.02393062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992886,0.0005037382,0.00001034238,0.0001045929,0.00005903813,0.00001967742,0.000006866228,0.000003244852,0.00000389825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3467117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04796270417820869,"score_gpt":0.324903317651637,"score_spread":0.2769406134734283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}