{"id":"W2581783831","doi":"10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.011","title":"Ambient ozone and incident diabetes: A prospective analysis in a large cohort of African American women","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment International","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","keywords":"Prospective cohort study; Diabetes mellitus; Environmental health; Medicine; Ozone; Cohort study; Cohort; Gerontology; Environmental science; Geography; Internal medicine; Meteorology; Endocrinology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008232833,0.0006989297,0.0006220013,0.0008664865,0.001629448,0.001232995,0.0006686986,0.0008799956,0.001434094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001224799,0.001049702,0.001175386,0.001728387,0.0004766056,0.0008644455,0.000848708,0.00126487,0.0002794242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003964178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006533813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02327377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02435135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994229,0.0001637314,0.00003570811,0.0001797454,0.00006184961,0.0001360213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992512,0.0001205862,0.0001797916,0.0001413857,0.00007870252,0.0002282847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002940569,0.00009618899,0.9982597,0.000004792976,0.0002058449,0.00009458482,0.0001121239,0.00001871,0.0004568563,0.00001622719,0.00008420751,0.0003566126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002210642,0.00009691805,0.9986927,0.000005748618,0.0001570915,0.0001399535,0.0005508654,0.0001230256,0.00005617351,0.00001821846,0.0001313196,0.0000058817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992959,0.0001658093,0.00008355953,0.00003046941,0.000007616577,0.00000719683,0.0002545581,0.000002260412,0.000152603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990903,0.0001415052,0.0001124434,0.0000445373,0.00001238958,0.00001459551,0.0003488371,0.000003931514,0.0002314516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02327377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04627657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01089869382517577,"score_gpt":0.2774081609285007,"score_spread":0.266509467103325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}