{"id":"W2581831498","doi":"10.4403/jlis.it-12052","title":"Aiutare le riviste a migliorare la loro qualità editoriale: un'analisi dei dati sugli effetti dei nuovi criteri di DOAJ","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Università di Firenze - Italian Journal of Library and Information Science","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Information retrieval; Data science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1836786,0.0009936161,0.002581112,0.01501679,0.002969618,0.01819983,0.003947868,0.002011418,0.0052859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5718871,0.0008510144,0.002615549,0.02953263,0.005683409,0.01033629,0.005086806,0.00352774,0.002123204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005475934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008915929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008469692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01147908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.71442,0.1045,0.04889456,0.01886968,0.1071891,0.006126623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2057325,0.5055329,0.1827643,0.02929938,0.06140869,0.01526221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001915063,0.0003182353,0.8399146,0.01094697,0.003165341,0.0003196141,0.007675726,0.0004250855,0.0008193362,0.002368428,0.02199204,0.1101396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003098116,0.000910877,0.9339415,0.002967642,0.001341441,0.0005589792,0.005147135,0.0007432213,0.001200131,0.002254603,0.0504606,0.0001640194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7573702,0.08897443,0.01252295,0.06043651,0.00534526,0.003911728,0.02821244,0.001387538,0.0418389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718402,0.006056012,0.008881842,0.003792701,0.002326549,0.001226384,0.002975645,0.0003892891,0.002511316],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9713971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03591103344717384,"score_gpt":0.3392527053109323,"score_spread":0.3033416718637584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}