{"id":"W2582248512","doi":"10.1111/eva.12460","title":"Evolution of movement rate increases the effectiveness of marine reserves for the conservation of pelagic fishes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolutionary Applications","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"Pew Charitable Trusts","keywords":"Tuna; Biology; Skipjack tuna; Fishing; Pelagic zone; Marine reserve; Fishery; Population; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Marine protected area; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Habitat; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009175747,0.00006245963,0.0001084605,0.00001682779,0.0006941238,0.000003743112,0.0003958642,0.00002629577,0.00009300261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002713266,0.00004144956,0.00005304174,0.00008995084,0.0008619953,0.00013287,0.0003939906,0.00003406488,0.000004478084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005986597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001398211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002167947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001184104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993733,0.0001072183,0.0001989489,0.0001301745,0.0001071964,0.00008315899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998053,0.00107473,0.0003170238,0.0004921319,0.00005371879,0.000009387362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001367816,0.0002176643,0.9129695,0.00009987113,0.00007705449,2.296294e-8,0.00002403815,0.00177329,0.00183933,0.07398686,0.008660932,0.0002146391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002262032,0.00004986873,0.9511792,0.00001074498,0.00005813318,1.485326e-7,0.00009712588,0.001311913,0.0006093999,0.04422826,0.002191748,0.00003725703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602254,0.0002222102,0.02078163,0.005072752,0.00007165951,0.003417979,0.000133513,0.00001740377,0.01005744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979634,0.00008815158,0.0004372416,0.00003652562,0.00001469375,0.001173202,0.00001987103,0.000003450829,0.0002635123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03820968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5338709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01240332496063681,"score_gpt":0.2431521509091455,"score_spread":0.2307488259485087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}