{"id":"W2583604970","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0169428","title":"Forest Connectivity Regions of Canada Using Circuit Theory and Image Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Collège Montmorency; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Space Agency; U.S. Forest Service; Government of Canada; Compute Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Ecosystem; Geography; Remote sensing; Computer science; Land cover; Cartography; Scale (ratio); Ecology; Land use; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000144262,0.00004310604,0.0001052796,0.00002001078,0.0002783083,0.00002710278,0.00008935924,0.0000154786,0.0003064205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001889419,0.00004225657,0.00002207093,0.00006595351,0.0001206525,0.0002336212,0.00006044836,0.00004003859,0.000001878571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001010927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002829345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4214321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6228501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995655,0.00003205309,0.00008000727,0.0001133139,0.0001301839,0.00007894523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994802,0.00007022417,0.0001176678,0.0002825509,0.00001279052,0.00003657479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009367906,0.0001120088,0.9555472,0.000006669612,0.0002343344,0.000001950946,0.000068651,0.00009863593,0.04241037,0.00125018,0.0001167732,0.0001439084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006086542,0.000009887633,0.9862168,0.00001601666,0.0003107738,7.817176e-7,0.00006691433,0.00756177,0.003617463,0.00205052,0.00002417829,0.00006401707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993786,0.000004363935,0.001060514,0.000198764,0.000009994471,0.0000534738,0.00001001161,0.00000380965,0.004873026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992779,0.000003825709,0.0002895755,0.00005960161,0.000009072845,0.000002861379,0.00000157105,0.000003102523,0.000352492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.201418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5824206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05322312751758496,"score_gpt":0.2304314117897124,"score_spread":0.1772082842721274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}