{"id":"W2584194979","doi":"10.1016/j.cam.2017.01.012","title":"Numerical analysis of a characteristic stabilized finite element method for the time-dependent Navier–Stokes equations with nonlinear slip boundary conditions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics","topic":"Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Variational inequality; Finite element method; Slip (aerodynamics); Boundary value problem; Mathematical analysis; Nonlinear system; Numerical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006595019,0.0001661802,0.0005896026,0.0001523818,0.0003115637,0.00009181225,0.0002492925,0.00003736346,0.00003310402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004095756,0.0001116244,0.0001454129,0.0001747053,0.0001371588,0.0001043249,0.00003401636,0.0001601783,0.000001593936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003780438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006024696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.275859e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.022808e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998508,0.00002405813,0.0007917776,0.0001015595,0.0004434234,0.0001311459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910042,0.007494199,0.0008759937,0.0001935889,0.0003604448,0.00007156444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003998288,0.0001372925,0.000008305422,0.0001902381,0.001208439,9.246288e-7,0.0004011053,0.9796363,0.0002864443,0.01348297,0.00001459901,0.004593393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005597413,0.0000785563,0.0003899776,0.00005321801,0.001040522,0.00001449262,0.0001215714,0.8956425,0.0001681023,0.101708,0.0001063082,0.0001169956],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005135833,0.00005712963,0.9939575,0.0002132266,0.00005697422,0.0003183221,0.0001371207,0.00001739191,0.0001064623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1715399,0.00001148489,0.8282685,0.00003128147,0.00006066906,0.0000341431,0.00002134106,0.00002194671,0.00001072137],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1664041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.455191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02737084736886287,"score_gpt":0.335695074860064,"score_spread":0.3083242274912011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}