{"id":"W2584194979","doi":"10.1016/j.cam.2017.01.012","title":"Numerical analysis of a characteristic stabilized finite element method for the time-dependent Navier–Stokes equations with nonlinear slip boundary conditions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics","topic":"Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Variational inequality; Finite element method; Slip (aerodynamics); Boundary value problem; Mathematical analysis; Nonlinear system; Numerical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005643613,0.0005024768,0.0005990803,0.000524187,0.0006003366,0.0006859256,0.0008991436,0.001496469,0.002428856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001950303,0.0003002841,0.0004438579,0.0003050294,0.001162478,0.0006241644,0.0009789659,0.0005869821,0.0002229571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004921591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001197436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003552198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002127989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998193,0.0000582913,0.000008078537,0.0000236499,0.00007135756,0.00001925336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990348,0.0004324343,0.0001125507,0.00005647049,0.0002885225,0.00007523136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001830668,0.0001174621,0.001715522,0.0001299186,0.00004074928,0.0001952961,0.0001675812,0.9271678,0.02055046,0.03207544,0.0008295845,0.01682718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005525519,0.0000166063,0.00007200436,0.000002613084,0.000001853965,0.000007994291,0.000004580917,0.9988422,0.0004784284,0.0004080813,0.0001566872,0.000003437613],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2358998,0.0003402107,0.7498308,0.0003959493,0.0002425914,0.0001408258,0.00007246029,0.000272609,0.01280472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9268011,0.0001385788,0.06769916,0.00008486056,0.00004902297,0.0001313406,0.00007393747,0.00008484841,0.00493709],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003552198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008125365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02737084736886287,"score_gpt":0.335695074860064,"score_spread":0.3083242274912011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}