{"id":"W2584283137","doi":"10.1037/apl0000207","title":"Dialectical thinking and fairness-based perspectives of affirmative action.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Affirmative action; Framing (construction); PsycINFO; Dialectic; Social psychology; Psychology; Diversity (politics); Cognitive style; Perception; Cognition; Public policy; Action (physics); Government (linguistics); Inequality; Political science; Epistemology; Law; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01384948,0.0006053197,0.0003115415,0.003830691,0.003318893,0.00935986,0.001364511,0.003074447,0.003752193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01835741,0.0002201216,0.0007223145,0.002558136,0.03452677,0.01054818,0.003746681,0.00468405,0.0003214657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007517138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004215506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002435343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001843063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988156,0.009084866,0.0003574616,0.0008177281,0.001133008,0.0004510152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821758,0.01335377,0.001786774,0.0008768507,0.0009936427,0.0008131483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001778896,0.00002778407,0.001018789,0.00007994996,0.00001046385,0.00007117376,0.0326083,0.0003836023,0.0001158775,0.9586909,0.0004139901,0.006561344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001501462,0.00001528437,0.001008056,0.0001878845,0.00001142952,0.00009120191,0.01123688,0.0009311293,0.0001815599,0.971323,0.01498799,0.00001066377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1234334,0.01305132,0.1635838,0.07429369,0.00103573,0.0002417928,0.0001987754,0.0001001219,0.6240614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730443,0.002183517,0.01802203,0.002635898,0.0001716312,0.0001775742,0.00004146024,0.00002302183,0.003700642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01384948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07324392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1617863919044697,"score_gpt":0.4266037822518965,"score_spread":0.2648173903474269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}