{"id":"W2584283137","doi":"10.1037/apl0000207","title":"Dialectical thinking and fairness-based perspectives of affirmative action.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Affirmative action; Framing (construction); PsycINFO; Dialectic; Social psychology; Psychology; Diversity (politics); Cognitive style; Perception; Cognition; Public policy; Action (physics); Government (linguistics); Inequality; Political science; Epistemology; Law; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00103732,0.00005205518,0.0001863968,0.00007094879,0.0006042775,0.00004433541,0.0002774916,0.00009812849,0.0001297579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001621836,0.00004703794,0.00005683839,0.00004176188,0.0007123792,0.0001674854,0.00002722209,0.000206979,0.000003631724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003189829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008544356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006044063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005536832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992929,0.0001061819,0.0001721747,0.00009269692,0.0002165393,0.0001194935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999032,0.0001233834,0.0005070104,0.0001185011,0.0001494737,0.00006958989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001860694,0.0008299725,0.02497809,0.00005475626,0.0003154652,0.00002570467,0.4074165,0.0000340663,0.004064609,0.5388585,0.003589715,0.0179719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00436553,0.0006085894,0.470684,0.00004695277,0.0001575135,0.00001490835,0.2792435,0.00001556586,0.001884211,0.2235549,0.01910128,0.0003231272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8457925,0.00006788365,0.003940169,0.007926373,0.0005820979,0.00008380619,0.000002112877,0.000007341243,0.1415977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984317,0.00008945987,0.001111407,0.0001538175,0.0001903246,4.04752e-7,8.59671e-8,0.000002228648,0.00002053873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4457059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4647675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1617863919044697,"score_gpt":0.4266037822518965,"score_spread":0.2648173903474269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}