{"id":"W2584904452","doi":"","title":"Comparative assessment of PIV-based pressure evaluation techniques applied to a transonic base flow","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"elib (German Aerospace Center)","topic":"Flow Measurement and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transonic; Airfoil; Surface pressure; Pressure measurement; Acoustics; Pressure sensor; Pressure-sensitive paint; Wind tunnel; Computer science; Pressure coefficient; Overall pressure ratio; Flow (mathematics); Dynamic pressure; Aerodynamics; Mechanical engineering; Aerospace engineering; Engineering; Mechanics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007797751,0.0005620582,0.000920917,0.0003264239,0.0000552194,0.00007047188,0.000457676,0.0002669012,0.0003327837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009202712,0.000512729,0.0003385763,0.0002280227,0.00004764681,0.00007879515,0.0001055922,0.0004496817,0.00002660541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001638749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005442582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004681237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971884,0.0001530093,0.0005904899,0.0005977359,0.001055868,0.0004145264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984614,0.0000388628,0.0001935187,0.0008395962,0.0002911969,0.0001754011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000221505,0.0009915172,0.002723752,0.003849144,0.003123115,0.00000724074,0.003876389,0.5304142,0.3936109,0.0002001072,0.04283098,0.01815125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002520815,0.0001435042,0.004762353,0.00267482,0.001438514,5.684591e-7,0.00006536266,0.6882884,0.2873259,0.0001460094,0.01110937,0.001524391],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2200037,0.002576147,0.7299897,0.001728416,0.002285856,0.0105349,0.001832455,0.002605704,0.02844316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891258,0.00005162612,0.00935581,0.00006000646,0.0001584875,0.0007025807,0.0003343346,0.00008098347,0.0001303404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7691222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0314710785737588,"score_gpt":0.314246981566618,"score_spread":0.2827759029928592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}