{"id":"W2585784017","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12215","title":"Competing Supremacies and Clashing Institutional Rationalities: the Danish Supreme Court's Decision in the <i>Ajos</i> Case and the National Limits of Judicial Cooperation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Danish; Law; Preliminary ruling; Scope (computer science); Political science; Economic Justice; Precedent; Constitutional court; European union; Perspective (graphical); Common law; Economics; Constitution","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02013395,0.0002991143,0.0009966561,0.001761736,0.01277227,0.02221146,0.002626173,0.01370602,0.004054013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02596442,0.0007775009,0.0008956348,0.001178132,0.03093404,0.00589877,0.0082832,0.008378001,0.0003869791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01560096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0111814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05371687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06961063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9801028,0.007577338,0.001341855,0.003230599,0.003135914,0.004611397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838063,0.01171905,0.0009048499,0.001089525,0.001338232,0.001142047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002472118,0.000009498073,0.0004637791,0.000012903,0.0000116971,0.0003415451,0.002846194,0.0003575791,0.0001120872,0.9941029,0.0009576352,0.000759517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001394698,0.00004614488,0.004145796,0.0003648493,0.0001576615,0.0004201136,0.01882018,0.003832229,0.001139892,0.9052221,0.06553145,0.000180074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3945314,0.003389207,0.006904655,0.0372251,0.0003769069,0.00008549197,0.0001215975,0.00002625348,0.5573393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945275,0.0001905015,0.0004615907,0.001024373,0.00003965471,0.00001387191,0.000009639431,0.000007261279,0.003725699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05371687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1131934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06142473417953803,"score_gpt":0.3290950465418682,"score_spread":0.2676703123623301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}