{"id":"W2585784017","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12215","title":"Competing Supremacies and Clashing Institutional Rationalities: the Danish Supreme Court's Decision in the <i>Ajos</i> Case and the National Limits of Judicial Cooperation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Danish; Law; Preliminary ruling; Scope (computer science); Political science; Economic Justice; Precedent; Constitutional court; European union; Perspective (graphical); Common law; Economics; Constitution","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007551024,0.00009423676,0.0001192088,0.00002861064,0.008128632,0.001115912,0.0004673607,0.00001775984,0.00002020728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002374352,0.00004962624,0.00004723416,0.00004755618,0.002505457,0.0006166252,0.0001289727,0.0003065239,0.000003655165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003790805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000790952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005760905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007836106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973772,0.001277807,0.0003731064,0.0001239625,0.0007090563,0.000138824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978383,0.001331492,0.0002891658,0.00009745476,0.000407734,0.00003584921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006014184,0.00001890749,0.0008837509,0.000002710261,0.00002295333,0.00006288413,0.01625822,0.0001544677,0.00002448794,0.9809977,0.0009027231,0.0006110148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009410526,0.0002246365,0.1151245,0.0008916414,0.0001501968,0.006846134,0.07781173,0.00379483,0.00006247946,0.04750486,0.7374603,0.0007181811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4808322,0.0005966595,0.0002557957,0.01535047,0.0004495408,0.0002473105,0.00002618474,0.000008910512,0.5022328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969704,0.0005315752,0.0001566521,0.001285668,0.0009540339,0.000001803603,0.000002141613,0.000006692586,0.0000910672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9334929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06142473417953803,"score_gpt":0.3290950465418682,"score_spread":0.2676703123623301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}