{"id":"W2585967196","doi":"10.1332/030557317x14860555458738","title":"Reconsidering the fiscal–social policy nexus: the case of social insurance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Social insurance; Nexus (standard); Welfare state; Legitimacy; Restructuring; Social Welfare; Economics; Public economics; Economic system; Political science; Finance; Market economy; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008043688,0.0002133671,0.0003478237,0.00009905454,0.01559536,0.0002658757,0.000950681,0.0002093309,0.00001021114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003537907,0.0001332688,0.000294418,0.0002478273,0.005182558,0.0002218989,0.0003316266,0.0003538633,0.00001750476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002188534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008059018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1760908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0234955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977311,0.0003724974,0.0003995196,0.0001953653,0.0003254864,0.0009760457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983792,0.0004017406,0.0004845058,0.0004437091,0.0001710177,0.0001198164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004537593,0.00002464961,0.0008153035,0.00001525035,0.00007592933,0.00001613947,0.1849913,6.249004e-7,0.000006943164,0.8071845,0.002559842,0.004304977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007512993,0.00004265433,0.1051807,0.00003260061,0.0001081051,0.00009002191,0.1240253,0.00001494711,0.0002283493,0.6859468,0.0830136,0.0005656676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4574064,0.00008218118,0.000002130099,0.2970061,0.0004438201,0.0003253427,0.0002292706,0.00006242173,0.2444423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742526,0.0001309956,0.000008712363,0.003004512,0.01927394,0.00002765869,8.256725e-7,0.00002455166,0.003276224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5168462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1656596913525909,"score_gpt":0.4114363937464503,"score_spread":0.2457767023938594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}