{"id":"W2585967196","doi":"10.1332/030557317x14860555458738","title":"Reconsidering the fiscal–social policy nexus: the case of social insurance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Social insurance; Nexus (standard); Welfare state; Legitimacy; Restructuring; Social Welfare; Economics; Public economics; Economic system; Political science; Finance; Market economy; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008976457,0.0004874771,0.0009202022,0.002011487,0.0150881,0.01194169,0.001781996,0.009675981,0.006026232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006239878,0.0004266174,0.0009850689,0.001590026,0.0317371,0.01254631,0.01043886,0.007163918,0.0003250551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01610095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01259772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02684765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03074001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937764,0.003503548,0.0001124108,0.000395073,0.0006712421,0.001541285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965275,0.002334779,0.0002942454,0.0001957829,0.0002559485,0.00039163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003789465,0.000006755864,0.0001179417,0.000004913266,0.000001493944,0.00009252405,0.0009541416,0.000377477,0.00001821806,0.9977597,0.0002044871,0.0004585045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003608035,0.00002004118,0.0004630295,0.0001214748,0.00001155114,0.0001300201,0.006733792,0.002573369,0.0001747663,0.9547099,0.03500386,0.00002210373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2101105,0.005948954,0.03044181,0.1880679,0.0005021635,0.0001398386,0.0000988963,0.00004503536,0.5646449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837559,0.001353111,0.002970365,0.002511242,0.0001812545,0.0000867832,0.00001220906,0.00001572306,0.009113295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02684765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1168211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1656596913525909,"score_gpt":0.4114363937464503,"score_spread":0.2457767023938594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}