{"id":"W2586058284","doi":"10.1007/bf02934905","title":"Explaining the socioeconomic well-being of immigrants and returned migrants: An econometric analysis of the Hong Kong and Canadian censuses of 2001","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l integration et de la migration internationale","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hong Kong Government; Hong Kong University of Science and Technology","keywords":"Immigration; Context (archaeology); Political science; Demographic economics; Human capital; Humanities; Geography; Ethnology; Economy; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001732789,0.0005651574,0.0006585813,0.001294432,0.001344856,0.002196475,0.001041122,0.0006498654,0.002381185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004490333,0.0005382475,0.001569091,0.00353376,0.0009085857,0.0008522324,0.0009899706,0.001022592,0.0004351311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008119338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007877944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9458228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9477095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999463,0.0001414669,0.00003751358,0.00007269908,0.00005524108,0.000229963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972464,0.0009877909,0.0005086928,0.0001891351,0.000605172,0.0004628259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121375,0.000071053,0.9901124,0.00002354175,0.0002351423,0.00011127,0.001169761,0.003874413,0.00008895381,0.0004973887,0.001158214,0.002536501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009857888,0.00001927903,0.9868722,0.00002378352,0.00008771865,0.00001414235,0.003415541,0.008480371,0.00005243552,0.00009207356,0.0009131767,0.00001948786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971288,0.0001852853,0.0001311795,0.0001862164,0.000008024522,0.00001377033,0.002023629,0.000006148578,0.0003168599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958918,0.0002204906,0.0001415558,0.00003286138,0.000006814887,0.0000164912,0.00256046,0.000004807687,0.001124782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05417722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1089925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01138946717711304,"score_gpt":0.2811202374798523,"score_spread":0.2697307703027392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}