{"id":"W2586298337","doi":"10.1007/s10530-017-1378-4","title":"Assessing the ecological impacts of invasive species based on their functional responses and abundances","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Invasions","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Inland Fisheries Ireland; Office National de l’Eau et des Milieux Aquatiques; Queen's University; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Queen's University Belfast; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Biology; Ecology; Invasive species; Introduced species; Round goby; Predation; Relative species abundance; Abundance (ecology); Neogobius","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001161496,0.0005051245,0.0002417428,0.001321081,0.0001757662,0.0005365013,0.0002466038,0.0002568458,0.001404811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00179968,0.0001300507,0.0003405547,0.0005029301,0.0003574084,0.0006027639,0.0005119035,0.0002842959,0.0002100747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002526372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009467327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001412564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00357532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996082,0.0001471234,0.00003442004,0.00007886079,0.0001014273,0.00002992159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980611,0.00074786,0.0006435408,0.0001197107,0.0002617653,0.000165997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001750997,0.0001061888,0.9449437,0.00009596503,0.0002527544,0.00006405354,0.00008945265,0.01093774,0.03096559,0.0001620198,0.0001195165,0.01208799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002285802,0.0003313192,0.9782119,0.000008002909,0.00005691239,0.0001480636,0.0001503868,0.01724311,0.003464919,0.0002067464,0.0001650821,0.00001116528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970783,0.00007623924,0.001641521,0.0000147803,0.000002318778,0.00001205716,0.0002476624,0.00002797419,0.0008990287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987963,0.00002738325,0.0008783972,0.000007201935,0.000002554749,0.000006697058,0.0001557208,0.000002304711,0.0001235246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001412564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006142676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2939813228724033,"score_gpt":0.3171393947436604,"score_spread":0.02315807187125712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}