{"id":"W2586606665","doi":"10.5539/ass.v13n3p1","title":"Understanding Faculty Collaboration and Productivity: A Case Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan","keywords":"Productivity; Promotion (chess); Christian ministry; Internationalization; Higher education; Business; Public relations; Political science; Economic growth; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009064823,0.0003960746,0.000443187,0.005990656,0.006192482,0.004015118,0.001838852,0.002619558,0.003076357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02079227,0.0003135704,0.0006868565,0.01074432,0.001784605,0.005765558,0.003073412,0.001515902,0.00038297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005800934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003735246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01640323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02417354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933476,0.004421724,0.000303612,0.0004455837,0.0007497472,0.00073179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596121,0.03221758,0.002980082,0.001187128,0.002118053,0.001885171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004290889,0.00396547,0.3232924,0.0009708602,0.0001362676,0.02064431,0.4301966,0.004756014,0.002681091,0.03009928,0.0071944,0.1756343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001461926,0.0006888472,0.13871,0.0006218541,0.0001709579,0.00503502,0.7587571,0.02428544,0.003638753,0.01550143,0.05233466,0.0001096865],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809224,0.0007623917,0.005657224,0.00232088,0.00002355432,0.0001548311,0.0002449796,0.0000406893,0.009873207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900959,0.000888737,0.006907491,0.0001988028,0.00004517301,0.0001421095,0.000144457,0.00001887386,0.001558493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04793996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8111552102405455,"score_gpt":0.6368228360453961,"score_spread":0.1743323741951494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}