{"id":"W2586768332","doi":"10.1177/1369148116687533","title":"Physical attractiveness, voter heuristics and electoral systems: The role of candidate attractiveness under different institutional designs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The British Journal of Politics and International Relations","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Flinders University; European Commission","keywords":"Heuristics; Attractiveness; German; Bivariate analysis; Stipulation; Representation (politics); Political science; Econometrics; Public relations; Computer science; Economics; Psychology; Law; Politics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002255232,0.00008507593,0.0001518681,0.00004360101,0.00119604,0.0001941223,0.0002823817,0.00006367777,0.00008296234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007684201,0.00006212595,0.00006490284,0.00001525658,0.0007411708,0.0002082371,0.00004958444,0.0003728367,0.000004278911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005216277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000613462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000522817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008194592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991763,0.000133675,0.000280876,0.0001001767,0.0001825916,0.0001263422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988217,0.0002932732,0.0004158809,0.000142196,0.000271765,0.00005512837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008647528,0.0004242272,0.1123879,0.000004982995,0.0004006026,0.00002582776,0.0004851171,0.0001829802,0.0004146736,0.8837007,0.0005218418,0.001364633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004870349,0.00006635541,0.9446307,0.0000835694,0.0001185214,0.001500783,0.0002991544,0.000263866,0.00001828402,0.05111984,0.001345264,0.00006662688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920673,0.001217412,0.001113389,0.001095855,0.0007854753,0.00009070307,0.0001475707,0.00000273758,0.003479518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978551,0.00007939453,0.00001673776,0.00003675088,0.0003919691,0.000006612588,0.000008601133,0.000007717875,0.001597077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8325809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9199095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04766756403976769,"score_gpt":0.3520658130672715,"score_spread":0.3043982490275038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}