{"id":"W2587226071","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1381","title":"Power Point in Legal Education: Pedagogical Paradox-An Exploratory Study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Point (geometry); Exploratory research; Power point; Legal education; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Mathematics education; Mathematics; Social science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01437424,0.0002291258,0.0006975683,0.002505371,0.007642166,0.007581789,0.002356248,0.002508848,0.006266009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04809728,0.0004616916,0.0002337687,0.002299982,0.01185774,0.01218241,0.007068463,0.005717245,0.0005379731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002904491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003942524,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001684259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002761575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891979,0.007665551,0.000187917,0.0007277426,0.00161115,0.0006096456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9333845,0.058284,0.002118513,0.001848694,0.001761515,0.002602797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001721939,0.002985059,0.02625752,0.000221156,0.00001225548,0.001428724,0.8250877,0.0002406998,0.0008788498,0.09564087,0.001616868,0.04545814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006879117,0.0004412688,0.01268797,0.0001960523,0.00001637378,0.0007292214,0.9318728,0.001453646,0.0008674638,0.03859812,0.01304453,0.0000237614],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9735174,0.0002467102,0.002964376,0.003379769,0.00003197517,0.0001544851,0.00002296326,0.00001255611,0.01966973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976624,0.000121105,0.0006299018,0.0001904285,0.000009180378,0.00006189081,0.000006742397,0.000007635708,0.001310786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01437424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07601917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1060163364822164,"score_gpt":0.437178764680401,"score_spread":0.3311624281981845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}