{"id":"W2588701636","doi":"10.1063/1.4975350","title":"Positive bias and vacuum chamber wall effect on total electron yield measurement: A re-consideration of the sample current method","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Physics","topic":"Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Electron; Sample (material); Detector; Secondary electrons; Current (fluid); Computational physics; Vacuum chamber; Work (physics); Physics; Atomic physics; Optics; Nuclear physics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003291596,0.0009151271,0.0008261832,0.000777499,0.0005577047,0.001214397,0.001517438,0.0009030522,0.0007669539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007930499,0.000547068,0.0006246051,0.0007631225,0.001044565,0.002202116,0.001385002,0.001048539,0.0003799673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009742095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005827153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001858174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001946261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997099,0.0006385253,0.0001164048,0.0004810932,0.001530983,0.0001340741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997133,0.001391462,0.0002477313,0.0005461735,0.0006411446,0.00004043207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007826561,0.0001212409,0.03238757,0.001971452,0.0002778439,0.001776065,0.001567449,0.02803122,0.5524799,0.05294537,0.002513132,0.3251462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002742609,0.0004524259,0.0139266,0.0002411148,0.0002598569,0.001590379,0.0003582975,0.2421667,0.7160302,0.006417216,0.01831129,0.0002185026],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1640484,0.01180127,0.8151361,0.0008768239,0.0008560905,0.0001137753,0.0001387273,0.00107618,0.005952585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8018956,0.00622458,0.1879997,0.0003199289,0.0002020494,0.0001038548,0.0001193773,0.0004065497,0.002728291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003291596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01740783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04165164182834619,"score_gpt":0.3230563450648541,"score_spread":0.281404703236508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}