{"id":"W2589302826","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0172653","title":"Understanding tree growth responses after partial cuttings: A new approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Cutting; Black spruce; Forest management; Residual; Taiga; Tree (set theory); Silviculture; Biology; Dendrochronology; Clearcutting; Forest ecology; Ecology; Ecosystem; Mathematics; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000652337,0.0005852534,0.0007823715,0.0006456613,0.0002418539,0.0007401623,0.0005926628,0.0003730132,0.0005353778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007351923,0.0001686023,0.000391228,0.0005648375,0.0005397496,0.000910279,0.0004444931,0.0004241074,0.0001002971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006599652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007271372,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03627553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05555508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998459,0.00003185402,0.000007791035,0.00006198623,0.0000328366,0.00001971137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996592,0.0001319522,0.00007360971,0.00005896734,0.00004664029,0.00002968723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005406194,0.0002901459,0.4385791,0.0007206623,0.0005174463,0.000240841,0.001505048,0.1698904,0.123174,0.003784741,0.0004831024,0.260274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000124101,0.0004515028,0.6637875,0.0000741019,0.0001808934,0.0002809926,0.0009331062,0.3166154,0.005111101,0.00893092,0.003548985,0.00007313131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8708393,0.005110879,0.1208716,0.0003065026,0.00001706064,0.0000577839,0.0007094102,0.0002856227,0.001801869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734407,0.001723854,0.02379794,0.00004695486,0.00003060281,0.00002200465,0.0003798086,0.00002383558,0.0005343101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03627553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07212877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.126093285988506,"score_gpt":0.2407910623120852,"score_spread":0.1146977763235792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}