{"id":"W2589309202","doi":"10.1186/s40554-017-0041-9","title":"Disciplinary variations in academic promotional writing: the case of statements of purpose","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Functional Linguistics","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Discipline; Rhetorical question; Persuasion; Academic writing; Discourse community; Genre analysis; English for academic purposes; Applied linguistics; Mainland; Sociology; Scientific writing; Mainland China; Linguistics; Pedagogy; Political science; Social science; China","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01545286,0.0002997098,0.0003682117,0.00472194,0.005605356,0.004713837,0.0007828914,0.000896621,0.001876712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05221507,0.0002649541,0.0001886565,0.003556468,0.007020948,0.003510374,0.005736154,0.001614275,0.0001989043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002165542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001937277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00172887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004438092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9832375,0.01264618,0.0005957982,0.0007469846,0.001963527,0.0008100383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92236,0.05879575,0.0086288,0.003012061,0.00476995,0.002433431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009208263,0.00003780747,0.01364336,0.0001411296,0.000007762558,0.001155632,0.9625252,0.00002957306,0.00198371,0.005145789,0.0003037821,0.01493425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001321928,0.00007143962,0.05599886,0.0002849951,0.00001648012,0.0009764549,0.9192138,0.0004114447,0.001427311,0.002560615,0.01899065,0.00003483505],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877502,0.0002364437,0.0008324704,0.0004355567,0.00004157787,0.00002594033,0.00001787059,0.000007854534,0.01065204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987544,0.00007731232,0.0004183632,0.00005901586,0.00002330636,0.00001845435,0.00001331747,0.000009926734,0.0006259051],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08172351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1001113096265334,"score_gpt":0.3825338767471552,"score_spread":0.2824225671206217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}