{"id":"W2589330644","doi":"10.1200/jco.2016.34.7_suppl.238","title":"“It looks good”: How a provincial radiation oncology program benefits from implementing peer review across cancer centers.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","topic":"Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Cancer Care Ontario; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University Health Network; Regional Municipality of Durham","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Radiation oncology; Thematic analysis; Medical education; Documentation; Family medicine; Quality assurance; Qualitative research; Oncology; Radiation therapy; Internal medicine; Pathology; Computer science; External quality assessment","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04742258,0.0003014056,0.0004151907,0.001323391,0.01953278,0.00947651,0.004175973,0.002621791,0.004345686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1570597,0.0004804055,0.0005908943,0.00176428,0.007247203,0.005523002,0.01013249,0.003885342,0.0005204761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04006883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1423946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2413113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4112294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9003437,0.07506032,0.002024184,0.002032509,0.01304397,0.007495395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8598604,0.04975761,0.01396051,0.00447318,0.0290862,0.04286199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001174668,0.0004298631,0.06681872,0.00109833,0.0000811866,0.002635585,0.6507242,0.0003883267,0.0009988184,0.006789537,0.0863423,0.1835756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006107285,0.0003360436,0.0696001,0.001250764,0.00007601495,0.0009089303,0.733582,0.0008864655,0.0003984406,0.003053011,0.1896968,0.000150368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6552333,0.003613159,0.004165028,0.234251,0.001215123,0.00206766,0.0002098262,0.0003999225,0.09884496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817395,0.001033093,0.003515942,0.006473171,0.00009802069,0.0003098718,0.00005664023,0.00006655234,0.00670717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9525774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4798135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1250957445473083,"score_gpt":0.5757427779154524,"score_spread":0.450647033368144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}