{"id":"W2589385015","doi":"10.14746/cl.2013.15.7","title":"TOWARDS GLOBAL LANGUAGE OF LAW - RECENZJA, COMPARATIVE LEGAL LINGUISTICS. LANGUAGE OF LAW, LATIN AND MODERN LINGUA FRANCAS. 2nd ed. AUTORSTWA HEIKKI E.S. MATTILA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Legilinguistics","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lingua franca; Law; Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000377601,0.0003308624,0.0008123443,0.00005247299,0.000385943,0.0001169622,0.0004279327,0.0001179619,0.000210703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001294085,0.0003157147,0.0001267989,0.0001737241,0.001982515,0.00009232292,0.0002002574,0.0002847383,0.00005032571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001535956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02605139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00671887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975532,0.0003056193,0.000714306,0.000406637,0.0006148146,0.0004054398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969474,0.0004247264,0.0004548451,0.000285236,0.001706214,0.000181549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004672099,0.0001712298,0.0007932542,0.00006678238,0.0001521618,0.00001968195,0.08099581,0.00006833964,0.0002245297,0.9149584,0.002319838,0.0001832069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003600772,0.001072992,0.01530441,0.001061353,0.0004382161,0.00001015531,0.07262212,0.01147286,0.01400601,0.04005704,0.83795,0.002404092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2312069,0.00302523,0.0002267317,0.00006709342,0.0009120435,0.0004112898,0.0003126844,0.0000798761,0.7637582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919606,0.00009070189,0.004671661,0.0002399143,0.0009929071,0.00001097999,0.00003611428,0.00001943049,0.00197769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8749014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05408764158997097,"score_gpt":0.36768686208587,"score_spread":0.313599220495899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}