{"id":"W2589458186","doi":"10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.02.008","title":"Design and development of an Electrostatic Screen Battery for Emission Control (ESBEC)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aerosol Science","topic":"Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; McMaster University","keywords":"Battery (electricity); Control (management); Engineering physics; Materials science; Engineering; Computer science; Physics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001132242,0.00007933926,0.0001610314,0.00006984358,0.0003459943,0.0001319394,0.000284888,0.00002636076,0.000003875013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002173908,0.00006552372,0.00001840962,0.00005022894,0.000132178,0.0009070946,0.00001011354,0.00007467962,4.63996e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005476151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002581585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.979894e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001779021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990827,0.00001647797,0.0003527599,0.00008633333,0.0002686541,0.0001930929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999161,0.00008918183,0.000284553,0.0001253306,0.0002125114,0.0001274247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006257703,0.00001470236,0.00009608276,0.0000188425,0.000009722209,6.348463e-7,0.0008473302,0.002336553,0.9849823,0.00001679359,0.0001037981,0.01151068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001031838,0.0004258085,0.002710256,0.00006204396,0.00001334616,0.00002403633,0.00007556904,0.09098636,0.9044368,0.0001068905,0.00001827327,0.0001088205],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4407743,0.00003479112,0.5588964,0.00006977529,0.0000766685,0.0001159274,0.000001063261,0.000006230172,0.00002481206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8782309,0.00001203423,0.1216839,0.00003041303,0.0000242592,0.000003167221,5.501755e-7,0.000006717451,0.000008081268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4374566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.267198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02423901914163805,"score_gpt":0.2770113209875413,"score_spread":0.2527723018459032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}