{"id":"W2590165940","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.091","title":"Comparative evaluation of the environmental impact of chemical methods used to enhance natural fibres for composite applications and glass fibre based composites","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cleaner Production","topic":"Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency","keywords":"Composite number; Composite material; Materials science; Glass fiber; Polypropylene; Polymer; Renewable resource; Life-cycle assessment; Renewable energy; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004588773,0.0003667827,0.0002749101,0.0004716552,0.0004191548,0.0003431649,0.0002257725,0.0004664689,0.002113464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005557177,0.0001629605,0.000446001,0.0003607663,0.0002818016,0.000345952,0.000243758,0.000308946,0.0001875705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002904714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002656973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003486203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995044,0.0001066443,0.00002949658,0.0000570469,0.0002229911,0.00007928793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991806,0.0003073208,0.0001140915,0.00003793025,0.0003141694,0.0000457847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001446569,0.0002351713,0.001682348,0.0002131362,0.00003335353,0.0001300202,0.00006598013,0.0008953752,0.9882694,0.00006953568,0.00004626309,0.006912786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001074584,0.002700261,0.00791474,0.000007073422,0.00004700607,0.00006639003,0.00007606066,0.0003817831,0.9879981,0.00002046706,0.0007691748,0.00000811617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972976,0.00054181,0.0005117216,0.00001598864,0.00001633571,0.00002387668,0.0001565357,0.000008583703,0.001427575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939347,0.001049247,0.001265507,0.000020066,0.00001621044,0.00002386066,0.000232667,0.00001528644,0.003442459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002113464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007070243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03737757158230959,"score_gpt":0.3975798292443554,"score_spread":0.3602022576620458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}