{"id":"W2590695820","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1604405114","title":"Social–ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Watershed; Sustainability; Environmental governance; Scale (ratio); Environmental resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Social network analysis; Restoration ecology; Natural resource; Computer science; Environmental science; Ecology; Business; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001435301,0.00005323446,0.0001809916,0.00006654668,0.0003228006,0.00002437425,0.000820509,0.00006903318,0.00005347397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007358955,0.00003147583,0.00007170365,0.0005738676,0.0003369775,0.0005127371,0.0002190326,0.00005830994,0.000001821255],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003191003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004579378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001382315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003328064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988407,0.00000800229,0.00027414,0.0001596556,0.000602432,0.0001149987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993616,0.0000416555,0.0005446144,0.00001021952,0.00002619698,0.00001575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001046915,0.00004157291,0.9815632,0.00001968787,0.00002160262,3.967305e-9,0.0004152542,0.004063772,0.01275983,0.0007566048,0.0002647475,0.0000832982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006717828,0.00001436778,0.9734051,0.00001723493,0.00003407861,1.787925e-7,0.0001081958,0.009854503,0.007309408,0.009126335,0.00002353641,0.0000399132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991309,0.00001013706,1.46041e-7,0.002017561,0.000008468684,0.00007553687,0.000002574918,0.000002770363,0.006573812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996403,0.000008209597,0.0002356716,0.00006011942,0.00002956206,0.000004400101,1.748783e-7,0.000001085726,0.00002050401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008369731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2482754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04073512542465799,"score_gpt":0.2934177036840139,"score_spread":0.2526825782593559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}