{"id":"W2590763270","doi":"10.1093/jpe/rtx013","title":"Species abundance distributions as a proxy for the niche–neutrality continuum","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Plant Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest; National Natural Science Foundation of China; McGill University","keywords":"Relative species abundance; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Rare species; Ecological niche; Neutral theory of molecular evolution; Interspecific competition; Niche; Biological dispersal; Common species; Community; Relative abundance distribution; Species diversity; Biology; Ecosystem; Population; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005596653,0.00006589826,0.0001691151,0.00001063251,0.0008015645,0.00003115886,0.0003806465,0.00005926043,0.0002040505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005863168,0.00004182686,0.00008382212,0.00001601309,0.0005209554,0.0001325475,0.00009854021,0.000156468,0.00003957725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007111856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002368302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001978986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005390003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993898,0.00003840941,0.000240293,0.00008549693,0.00006886955,0.0001771317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987305,0.0005241282,0.0005316184,0.000146577,0.00003201973,0.00003509409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000999062,0.00008087867,0.9605705,0.000005103785,0.00009216099,0.00001978396,0.0002733298,0.0001035843,0.0006110268,0.008632808,0.02941485,0.00009607113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003759469,0.0001815254,0.943953,0.000003431576,0.00004347999,0.0001188094,0.00009298624,0.0002578537,0.0001137673,0.007196052,0.04761421,0.00004889846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760407,0.0000606686,0.00153217,0.01716656,0.001169753,0.0002787861,0.000137783,0.000005130134,0.003608512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961278,0.0001162112,0.0002497426,0.0002140619,0.0001004076,0.00001708063,0.00000334759,0.000002564318,0.003168757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02008719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6165068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01780027930787932,"score_gpt":0.2741404124135302,"score_spread":0.2563401331056509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}