{"id":"W2590763270","doi":"10.1093/jpe/rtx013","title":"Species abundance distributions as a proxy for the niche–neutrality continuum","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Plant Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest; National Natural Science Foundation of China; McGill University","keywords":"Relative species abundance; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Rare species; Ecological niche; Neutral theory of molecular evolution; Interspecific competition; Niche; Biological dispersal; Common species; Community; Relative abundance distribution; Species diversity; Biology; Ecosystem; Population; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001123909,0.0002751991,0.0002628679,0.001182287,0.0003531777,0.000597648,0.0004900871,0.0003533082,0.001138426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004125476,0.0002115039,0.0003585552,0.0005744745,0.0008888867,0.0007368325,0.0007362264,0.0004897934,0.00009879078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000591032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001653474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001245543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001089654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996248,0.000138826,0.00002737606,0.0001061737,0.00006652385,0.00003627818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973961,0.001519772,0.0004554102,0.0002631415,0.0001562884,0.0002093631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005626435,0.0002144331,0.4597765,0.0002164435,0.0003790556,0.000521856,0.001249013,0.4035015,0.0744748,0.03251737,0.0005103811,0.02607602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008116871,0.000379027,0.2742498,0.00002207128,0.00006022272,0.0008283824,0.0004387202,0.6776257,0.006445696,0.03746156,0.00232399,0.00008373857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812286,0.00008883753,0.01700865,0.00005012222,0.000003396341,0.00001902175,0.0001918512,0.00008180289,0.00132763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972655,0.00001557341,0.002520567,0.000008641833,0.000001969643,0.0000159444,0.00009955197,0.000005357813,0.00006697507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001245543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005943835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01780027930787932,"score_gpt":0.2741404124135302,"score_spread":0.2563401331056509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}