{"id":"W2590870827","doi":"","title":"Taking the Plunge: Open Access at the \"Canadian Journal of Sociology.\" Case Studies in Open Access Publishing. Number Five.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access journal; Sociology; Open access publishing; Library science; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071371,0.0004667742,0.0003159248,0.004827485,0.02821592,0.0177746,0.002417904,0.007817216,0.06217086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01886626,0.0004546194,0.0004889505,0.00734365,0.01604979,0.01577231,0.006449465,0.00474793,0.005322997],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01815502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04966177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5413569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8013916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900643,0.0016547,0.0002909527,0.000405641,0.005708227,0.001876094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811582,0.004771282,0.0006220691,0.001136223,0.005060332,0.00725192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007018458,0.0001043559,0.002578433,0.0002604987,0.0000112071,0.002073892,0.02161879,0.0001013007,0.0005671481,0.261348,0.5755153,0.1357508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001287033,0.00001978325,0.005306238,0.0003501553,0.0000136631,0.0004619975,0.02092626,0.0001222311,0.0004322938,0.03273942,0.9395524,0.00006253481],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0193078,0.02177732,0.00349165,0.2115169,0.007595742,0.000267748,0.0005088483,0.000387682,0.7351463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3984296,0.01493817,0.00650523,0.02034689,0.001253669,0.0001686604,0.0004672659,0.0003818422,0.5575087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9226884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.89796711116227,"score_gpt":0.723946756507205,"score_spread":0.174020354655065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}