{"id":"W2590870827","doi":"","title":"Taking the Plunge: Open Access at the \"Canadian Journal of Sociology.\" Case Studies in Open Access Publishing. Number Five.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access journal; Sociology; Open access publishing; Library science; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1176195,0.0001601238,0.0003290047,0.02328331,0.004314975,0.09294292,0.03892517,0.0001426016,0.003998107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1034692,0.00008237651,0.0001432016,0.0345959,0.00140144,0.07354462,0.009990384,0.00346885,0.00013256],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003577615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01051852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02381657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08022809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9855202,0.002004521,0.001777741,0.000288581,0.009061039,0.001347891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9690133,0.00643411,0.001745019,0.0005808434,0.02166586,0.0005608428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005447151,0.0001809074,0.3746946,0.000009368722,0.0004875122,0.001969529,0.03013375,0.003524437,0.000005522535,0.06892576,0.4249693,0.09455454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004318983,0.0005789173,0.2753828,0.0001218117,0.00001272786,0.06772875,0.032555,0.01072678,0.0000835169,0.3354265,0.2725959,0.0004682588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9126548,0.00102064,0.0004682874,0.03536323,0.001403718,0.0007930719,0.00005743308,0.000003793894,0.04823499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994458,0.002341814,0.00004208567,0.0009682364,0.0003155803,0.00003092386,0.0000101739,0.000008326853,0.001824845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2665008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988302,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.89796711116227,"score_gpt":0.723946756507205,"score_spread":0.174020354655065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}