{"id":"W2591192214","doi":"10.1093/heapro/dax002","title":"Multidisciplinarity in health promotion: a bibliometric analysis of current research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Promotion International","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Discipline; Public health; Promotion (chess); Health promotion; Sociology; Politics; Social science; Public relations; Political science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02930396,0.0001511733,0.0005706144,0.08802621,0.001277297,0.0006933737,0.001921991,0.00008403037,0.001075415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006305923,0.0001277255,0.000195798,0.07553763,0.0003000151,0.001179841,0.0008383219,0.0006155565,0.000130024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008649349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00144305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005104622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005721385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896942,0.001827177,0.001930393,0.0008087344,0.00508761,0.0006519349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926414,0.0005438888,0.001514337,0.001119488,0.003843188,0.0003377042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002540441,0.004517825,0.6989695,0.0001675402,0.0001678517,0.000007987956,0.002868479,0.0005957146,0.00005482699,0.02219606,0.01019031,0.2600098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006667749,0.001031598,0.9322306,0.0001775778,0.000004281789,0.000002101413,0.000473253,0.05020221,0.00003867141,0.01185806,0.003213114,0.0001017723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8655848,0.0004673481,0.01412879,0.1118242,0.002239451,0.001718166,0.0003363056,0.00003561811,0.003665332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975753,0.0001852751,0.0004223492,0.00001881127,0.0002189241,0.0001335825,0.0001124215,0.000009266208,0.00132402],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2599081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6055370720739831,"score_gpt":0.6582484166111037,"score_spread":0.05271134453712056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}