{"id":"W2591860702","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v46i4.186346","title":"Examining Success and Sustainability of Academic Writing: A Case Study of Two Writing-Group Models","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Academic writing; Reflexivity; Higher education; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Pedagogy; Psychology; Public relations; Mathematics education; Political science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03323821,0.0008796866,0.0008489192,0.003266511,0.02060708,0.01158777,0.004370998,0.005035609,0.003629252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06502575,0.0007708149,0.0009865895,0.002813901,0.01472988,0.008902957,0.01117023,0.005021607,0.0009179618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008811112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008740384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006092657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01306218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9662615,0.02608209,0.0007703182,0.001348856,0.002998138,0.002539051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9190803,0.05387008,0.006937574,0.006534745,0.003813056,0.009764402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000184213,0.00224151,0.0157391,0.0001322688,0.00001955619,0.003879135,0.9342372,0.0004499803,0.0009053912,0.01348999,0.001052045,0.02766973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001151299,0.000875943,0.00786359,0.0001661935,0.00002645353,0.001324572,0.9561746,0.002026578,0.001551177,0.006645603,0.02315238,0.00007768811],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832118,0.0001265947,0.002656549,0.002570358,0.00004400307,0.000193958,0.00001494242,0.00003066,0.01115117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899995,0.0002098559,0.004429572,0.000271396,0.00002299653,0.000235741,0.00002043801,0.00003730957,0.004773378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03323821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1757825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2624534671325874,"score_gpt":0.5429227213921165,"score_spread":0.2804692542595291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}