{"id":"W2592005087","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.6468","title":"Optimum Frequency of Peer Evaluations in Capstone Design Courses","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Dysfunctional family; Psychology; Premise; Capstone; Peer review; Peer evaluation; Peer feedback; Applied psychology; Peer assessment; Computer science; Higher education; Clinical psychology; Mathematics education; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02020323,0.0005237752,0.001225125,0.001249269,0.001276703,0.001785527,0.001480401,0.001112538,0.002571352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1164429,0.0005248364,0.0003158464,0.0005018308,0.0004313181,0.001864023,0.002080196,0.0009884378,0.001077317],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009559819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00160915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006160723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001316927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9643079,0.01978645,0.003135923,0.003933826,0.007325705,0.001510182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.902989,0.05176227,0.01292644,0.008885638,0.0148747,0.008562059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007426243,0.01153317,0.2149167,0.0006618917,0.0001409922,0.000607076,0.003792301,0.012037,0.02975107,0.0009788685,0.002966597,0.7151881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001087812,0.04222692,0.8433747,0.001045297,0.0002960841,0.002621159,0.005908634,0.04667127,0.03574778,0.004139727,0.01645906,0.0004215892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800642,0.0004202224,0.01377883,0.0003115796,0.0001396222,0.000503762,0.00003765738,0.0002456199,0.004498504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867617,0.0001019181,0.01178578,0.00004642405,0.00008016134,0.000332209,0.00003399973,0.00002293155,0.000834907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.999044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1068462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02194009769331235,"score_gpt":0.2795834094031712,"score_spread":0.2576433117098589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}