{"id":"W2592017952","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2017v42n1a3093","title":"Claiming Space for Square Pegs: Community-Engaged Communication Scholarship and Faculty Assessment Policies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Promotion (chess); Public relations; General partnership; Academic community; Work (physics); Sociology; Space (punctuation); Value (mathematics); Political science; Square (algebra); Engaged scholarship; Media studies; Social science; Politics; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0123068,0.00009307638,0.0001649071,0.0001550748,0.02362357,0.001053213,0.001470112,0.00009259879,0.00004547895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004255612,0.0001001714,0.00006418574,0.00007069061,0.0004585537,0.001259825,0.00007547349,0.001854049,0.000002070657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000432614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00125588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05779111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2549587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994549,0.004649483,0.0003177709,0.00006064906,0.0001932369,0.0002298265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959644,0.001209816,0.0007537371,0.001043639,0.0006444535,0.0003839626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003582217,0.0001741862,0.2797872,0.00007832936,0.0002070471,0.000001791915,0.4148769,0.00007931452,0.0001773647,0.2428679,0.01500398,0.04671006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004769898,0.00005554666,0.5166471,0.0001920876,0.00005242525,0.000005021604,0.1193446,0.00001518714,0.00002073913,0.007234508,0.3558178,0.0001380129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8791392,0.001652378,0.0005620556,0.096307,0.0002926714,0.000497764,0.00003341721,0.00001655863,0.02149895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899358,0.0009109773,0.008383565,0.0002458938,0.00006742474,0.00001786038,0.00003183174,0.00001266565,0.000394025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3408138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2499591561613922,"score_gpt":0.4635897060317027,"score_spread":0.2136305498703105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}