{"id":"W2592044354","doi":"10.1017/s0266267116000286","title":"THE FITTING-ATTITUDE ANALYSIS OF VALUE RELATIONS AND THE PREFERENCES VS. VALUE JUDGEMENTS OBJECTION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Parity (physics); Preference relation; Mathematical economics; Relation (database); Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007964338,0.000099133,0.0002207895,0.00005975152,0.002411229,0.000458179,0.0002324547,0.00004546389,0.0000468714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001010627,0.00005808576,0.0001069746,0.00001593239,0.00145709,0.0001626319,0.0001279777,0.0001544289,0.000004004808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008037819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001750224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003466887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004710582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993444,0.00007116107,0.0002583837,0.0001718526,0.00005616464,0.00009805434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987976,0.0004507145,0.0003113745,0.0003524118,0.00005093892,0.00003693963],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004693357,0.00001339895,0.0007178826,0.000006103048,0.0005503643,5.811201e-8,0.002301242,0.0001055491,2.862168e-7,0.9957252,0.00001101128,0.0005219512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003615339,0.00003311205,0.005872599,0.00001011604,0.0003421106,1.734557e-7,0.00008641142,0.005753353,0.000002504346,0.9798229,0.007638422,0.00007675647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6597296,0.0006308912,0.000008022264,0.03388923,0.0005112922,0.0002215433,0.00009189602,0.00001192249,0.3049056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975867,0.001491081,0.000008757132,0.0003321721,0.0003499195,0.00001228003,0.000006636935,0.000006492571,0.0002059181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3378571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03503583966933008,"score_gpt":0.2487665515241462,"score_spread":0.2137307118548161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}