{"id":"W2592133083","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2017.02.011","title":"Cone beam computed tomography incidental findings of the cervical spine and clivus: retrospective analysis and review of the literature","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","topic":"Dental Radiography and Imaging","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Clivus; Medicine; Radiography; Context (archaeology); Cone beam computed tomography; Radiology; Retrospective cohort study; Confidence interval; Cervical spine; Computed tomography; Skull; Surgery; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002470117,0.0008644101,0.006855974,0.0009096337,0.000398573,0.00004326024,0.0007513206,0.0008918133,0.0001117746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001063478,0.0004704324,0.001564412,0.002524573,0.00583036,0.0002319382,0.0007421714,0.001500984,0.00000174454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004905564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009005161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000199319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001801092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941265,0.00198091,0.001789657,0.001073744,0.0004155026,0.0006137083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961078,0.0005874583,0.001816772,0.001033574,0.0002265203,0.000227909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008817574,0.0001051143,0.8224491,0.02045843,0.001988693,0.0006436293,0.000124362,5.192373e-8,0.00002622734,0.0002554217,0.004063393,0.1497974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008749741,0.0003911839,0.8871536,0.04278991,0.01030056,0.008840276,0.0000355855,0.000004716779,0.00001066351,0.0003855243,0.04856849,0.0006445652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.07901981,0.9177847,0.0000103218,0.0004395107,0.001542565,0.0007963244,0.0003312981,0.00002678343,0.00004872011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1017572,0.8967769,0.00009784829,0.0007546872,0.0001607218,0.00002348203,0.0002958131,0.00004102614,0.00009235641],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1491529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02831252209558726,"score_gpt":0.3246235484615075,"score_spread":0.2963110263659202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}